B300
UK
{"@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [{"@type": "Service", "@id": "https://gpuaas.com/gpu/b300-cost-per-token#service", "name": "B300 Cost per Token", "provider": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "GPUaaS.com", "url": "https://gpuaas.com"}, "serviceType": "GPU cloud infrastructure", "description": "B300 cost per token: when the premium over B200 pays off by avoiding a multi-GPU split, and when it doesn't. Real comparison across the full lineup."}, {"@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://gpuaas.com/gpu/b300-cost-per-token#webpage", "url": "https://gpuaas.com/gpu/b300-cost-per-token", "name": "B300 Cost per Token", "isPartOf": {"@type": "WebSite", "name": "GPUaaS.com", "url": "https://gpuaas.com"}}, {"@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://gpuaas.com/gpu/b300-cost-per-token#breadcrumb", "itemListElement": [{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://gpuaas.com"}, {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "GPU Cloud", "item": "https://gpuaas.com/cluster"}, {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "B300 Cost per Token", "item": "https://gpuaas.com/gpu/b300-cost-per-token"}]}, {"@type": "FAQPage", "@id": "https://gpuaas.com/gpu/b300-cost-per-token#faq", "mainEntity": [{"@type": "Question", "name": "Does B300 ever lower cost per token compared to B200?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "It can, specifically when B300's 288GB avoids a multi-GPU split that even B200 would need, or once your serving engine fully supports NVFP4 for a meaningful throughput gain. For models that already run efficiently on B200 or H200, B300 raises cost per token for identical work."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "How do I calculate whether B300 saves money over B200 for my model?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Compare the total cost of the full setup each generation needs, not just the hourly rate: if B200 needs two cards and B300 needs one for the same model, B300's total cost can come out lower despite its higher per-GPU rate."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Do the same batching and quantization levers apply to B300?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, identically. Batching, quantization and engine choice all move cost per token by similar multiples on B300 as they do on every earlier generation, since these remain software-level optimizations independent of which GPU you're running."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Does B300's NVFP4 support already improve cost per token today?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Not yet broadly, since native NVFP4 support is still maturing across mainstream serving engines, the same adoption pattern as B200's FP4. Most B300 cost-per-token figures today reflect FP8 or BF16 performance."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What's the clearest case where B300 wins on cost per token?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "The clearest case is a model that needs multi-GPU splitting on even B200 purely to fit memory, not because compute demands it. Removing that extra GPU by moving to a single B300 is where the cost-per-token math tends to favor B300 today."}}]}]}
GPUAAS.COM · WHOLESALE GPU NETWORK / A HOSTED·AI SERVICE ◆ CAPACITY AVAILABLE · 20+ PARTNERSQUOTES < 24HREV 2026.09
+
+
◆
B300 cost per million tokens
◆ AVAILABLE

B300
cost per token
, at
wholesale price.

Real B300 rental cost-per-million-token economics, and when the premium over B200 actually pays off, at
~30% less than hyperscale. Quotes in under 24 hours.

HGX GPU node
GPU generations
8
Architectures
Hopper + Blackwell + Vera Rubin
Vetted partners
20+
Quote turnaround
24 hrs
Commitment
Short / long
QUOTES IN UNDER 24 HOURS VETTED PARTNERS WORLDWIDE SHORT OR LONG TERM COMMITMENT DIRECT OPERATOR CONTRACTS CAPACITY AVAILABLE NOW PLACEMENT YOU SPECIFY
◆ THE SHORT ANSWER

B300's cost-per-token math extends the same logic established across B200: the premium only pays off when it genuinely changes your setup, either by avoiding a multi-GPU split that even B200 would need, or by unlocking NVFP4 throughput gains once your engine supports it. For models that already run efficiently on B200, H200 or H100, B300 raises cost per token for identical work. B200, H200 and H100 cost per token cover the same batching, quantization and engine levers that apply equally to B300.

+
01
PRICING

What actually drives B300 cost per token

B300 median on-demand rate runs $7.50/hr, a real premium over B200's $6.01/hr median. Whether that premium lowers or raises your actual cost per token depends entirely on whether it lets you avoid a multi-GPU split that even B200 would need.

Market reference as of September 2026, quoted in USD. Cost-per-token figures shown are illustrative; actual figures vary by model, whether B300's memory avoids a multi-GPU split, batch size, and quantization used.
Wholesale rates through GPUaaS.com are quoted per enquiry and vary by commitment term, configuration and placement.

$0$2.50$5$7.50$10$12.50$15/GPU-HR
B200, single-stream BF16
One B200, per million tokens
$1.63
B200 x2 (split), FP8
Two B200s, model needs the split
$0.93
B300 x1, FP8 (same model)
One B300, no split needed
$0.56
B300, single-stream BF16
One B300, model already fit on B200
$2.03
◆ GPUaaS.com wholesale
Vetted partners · direct operator contract
quoted per enquiry
B300 COST PER MILLION TOKENS, BY SETUP
+
02
◆
What actually moves B300 cost per token

The levers that change B300 cost per token, and by how much.

B300's cost-per-token calculation extends the same logic established across H100, H200 and B200: a higher hourly rate only pays off when it genuinely changes the setup a model needs, not as a blanket upgrade. The clearest win is a model that needs a multi-GPU split on even B200, purely for memory reasons rather than compute demand; moving that model to a single B300 can lower total cost per token despite the higher per-GPU rate, since fewer GPUs are being paid for in total. For models that already run efficiently on a single B200 or H200, B300 offers no corresponding benefit and simply raises cost per token for identical work. Native NVFP4 support represents real future upside once mainstream serving engines fully support it, but most B300 cost-per-token figures today still reflect FP8 or BF16 performance rather than NVFP4's full potential, the same adoption pattern B200's FP4 followed.

/01

Removing unnecessary multi-GPU splits

Avoiding a two-GPU B200 split by moving to one B300 can lower total cost per token despite B300's higher rate, for models that need the memory.
avoids split · lower total cost · memory-bound
/02

No benefit when earlier generations fit

For models that already run efficiently on B200 or H200, B300 raises cost per token for the same work since the rate is higher without a corresponding benefit.
no benefit · higher cost · already efficient
/03

Same optimization levers apply

Batching, quantization and engine choice move B300 cost per token by the same multiples they do across every earlier generation.
batching · quantization · same levers
/04

NVFP4 gains still to come

NVFP4 support is still maturing across engines, so most B300 figures today reflect FP8 or BF16 rather than NVFP4's full potential.
NVFP4 maturing · FP8/BF16 today · future upside
+
03
◆ LIVE NETWORK · 12 LOCATIONS

B300 capacity worldwide, in the location you need.

The hourly rate you pay for B300 capacity is one input into cost per token, and it varies meaningfully by region and provider. See B300 availability by country below.

Read the full guide to GPU cloud in this location →
8
GPU GENERATIONS
20+
VETTED PARTNERS
12
PLACEMENT OPTIONS
24h
QUOTE TURNAROUND
◆ USA◆ CAN◆ UK◆ DEU◆ FRA◆ NLD◆ UAE◆ SAU◆ IND◆ SGP◆ JPN◆ AUS

Every location links to its own page. Click through for local pricing and specs.

04
◆ COST COMPARISON

See how much you save at scale

Wholesale rates against cloud list price for a 64-GPU cluster.

CLUSTER SIZE
8 GPU Servers
64 × GPUS · 730 HRS/MO
ASSUMPTIONS · BLENDED $6.00/GPU-HR · INDICATIVE ONLY
SOURCEEST. MONTHLYVS GPUAAS
Retail cloud
On-demand list price · reserved discounts require lock-in
~$280k
+$84k
Direct datacentre negotiation
Long-term commitment · slow procurement cycle
~$230k
+$34k
◆ BEST VALUE
GPUaaS.com wholesale
Vetted partners · direct operator contract · quotes in 24 hours
~$196k
SAVE ~$84k/MO
Need single-GPU compute? packet.ai has you covered.
+
05
◆ HOW IT WORKS

A matchmaker, not a marketplace.

We connect you to our vetted partners. You contract directly with the operator running your nodes.

STEP 01/4
01

Tell us the requirement

GPU model, count, placement and timeline. Add workload detail if you have it.

STEP 02/4
02

We match capacity

We find vetted partners with capacity that fits, in the jurisdiction you need.

STEP 03/4
03

Quotes in 24 hours

Real quotes from partners who hold the capacity, not listings that may not exist.

STEP 04/4
04

Contract and provision

You contract directly with the operator. We smooth the provisioning process.

Get a quote
Request wholesale rates
in under 24 hours.

Tell us the essentials. We'll line up real quotes from our vetted wholesale partners, and you contract directly with the operator.

◆Quotes in under 24 hours
◆Direct contact with operators
◆Vetted partners, matched to your requirement
◆20+ vetted providers · 12 locations
1
ESSENTIALS
2
OPTIONAL
Contact
Full Name *
Business Email *
Organization *
Preferred Location *
Your Region *
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
GPU Requirements
GPU Model *
PRE-SELECTED
Number of GPUs *
Individual GPU count. 1 node = 8 GPUs.
Get the Best Deal→
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
+
06
◆ FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1
Does B300 ever lower cost per token compared to B200?

It can, specifically when B300's 288GB avoids a multi-GPU split that even B200 would need, or once your serving engine fully supports NVFP4 for a meaningful throughput gain. For models that already run efficiently on B200 or H200, B300 raises cost per token for identical work.

Q2
How do I calculate whether B300 saves money over B200 for my model?

Compare the total cost of the full setup each generation needs, not just the hourly rate: if B200 needs two cards and B300 needs one for the same model, B300's total cost can come out lower despite its higher per-GPU rate.

Q3
Do the same batching and quantization levers apply to B300?

Yes, identically. Batching, quantization and engine choice all move cost per token by similar multiples on B300 as they do on every earlier generation, since these remain software-level optimizations independent of which GPU you're running.

Q4
Does B300's NVFP4 support already improve cost per token today?

Not yet broadly, since native NVFP4 support is still maturing across mainstream serving engines, the same adoption pattern as B200's FP4. Most B300 cost-per-token figures today reflect FP8 or BF16 performance.

Q5
What's the clearest case where B300 wins on cost per token?

The clearest case is a model that needs multi-GPU splitting on even B200 purely to fit memory, not because compute demands it. Removing that extra GPU by moving to a single B300 is where the cost-per-token math tends to favor B300 today.

Q6
What's the real NVIDIA B300 rental rate compared to B200?

B300 median on-demand rate runs $7.50/hr, a real premium over B200's $6.01/hr, H200's $4.40/hr and H100's $3.33/hr median. NVIDIA B300 rental pricing is quoted per enquiry and varies by commitment term, configuration and placement.